City Attorney Herrera and ES&S Resolve Litigation

ES&S Agrees to $3.5 Million Settlement

SAN FRANCISCO (Jan. 22, 2008)- The City and County of San Francisco and Election Systems & Software (ES&S) have resolved litigation related to costs San Francisco incurred in meeting the Secretary of State’s new certification requirements imposed on the ES&S voting system used in San Francisco for the November 2007 election and a dispute regarding the state certification of modifications to the AutoMARK ballot marking devices used by voters with disabilities. San Francisco had purchased the AutoMARK machines from ES&S for $3.79 million in 2006.

The settlement agreement, which City Attorney Dennis J. Herrera reached with ES&S, provides that ES&S will pay $3.5 million in exchange for the return of the AutoMARK ballot marking devices and dismissal of San Francisco’s legal claims. San Francisco also agrees to pay ES&S’s outstanding invoices for voting supplies and services. The agreement also states that it is not an admission of liability by ES&S. The settlement agreement must be approved by the San Francisco City and County Board of Supervisors.

“People’s faith in a representative democracy depends heavily on the quality of the elections process,” said Herrera. “I appreciate ES&S’s willingness to participate in finding a resolution to this matter, and I am gratified that we were able to quickly come to an agreement that will allow us to enter the next election cycle with equipment that meets state standards.”

“This resolution is a creative approach that benefits both parties,” said John S. Groh, Senior Vice President, ES&S. “San Francisco no longer had a need for its 563 AutoMARK ballot marking devices and ES&S did. We will continue to do all that we can to support the election-related needs of jurisdictions in California and other states. Resolution of this matter should also help to ease San Francisco’s transition to a new voting system.”

The case was City and County of San Francisco et al v. Election System and Software, Inc., San Francisco Superior Court, filed Nov. 20, 2007.

Twitter
Visit Us
Follow Me
LinkedIn
Share
RSS
EMAIL